11-22-2018 11:09 AM - edited 02-03-2024 11:17 PM
Hello,
There are many configuration items which we used to just find nicely and quickly in the appropriate configuration node (in my case, Sales & Distribution) which now are outside the area Configure Your Solution. As an example, the Field Catalog, Condition tables, Access sequences are now available as tiles under Pricing Configuration for Sales 'menu'.
This means that everything configured in Q system is not available in P system as this is not included in the Q2P deployment.
Is there a particular reqson as to why SAP has moved those configuration items outside th enormal configuration area.? This also creates a axtra workload to redo all in P system.
Thanks,
Sidi
Please note - All configurations made in the groups ‘Pricing Configuration for Sales’ and ‘Pricing Configuration for Purchasing’ need to be exported from the Q-system into a software collection and imported to the productive system manually - there is no double maintenance.
Make sure that the changes have been imported in the P-System before the related changes from ‘Configure your Solution’ are transferred to the P-System.
~p
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Isn't this actually a good thing? By moving the ability to update configuration type items that are in practice quite dynamic out of the IMG (or SCCUI) world and into an app, this means that the task of maintaining them can now be handed over to a key user, rather than requiring someone with Q system access to make the change and go through a transport process. This is particularly useful in S4HC where config from Q gets regularly locked down during the upgrade cycle.
It might be a bit of a pain as a consultant having to maintain things twice in Q and P - but if you look at the bigger picture of what happens once the system is like, then surely there is a much bigger business benefit in having things set up like this!
I for one hope that this does not change.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I agree, and view it as mostly a good thing. Yes there are some challenges with making sure that Quality and Prod are in sync for testing, etc. I hope that SAP gives us some more tools to copy back or sync up those master data elements, but I'd gladly trade that off to give the users the ability to own and maintain more of their master data table elements. When you think of the SSCUI structure in S4HC any config changes you make it Quality are likely to be transported as soon as you put the change project in run phase anyway whether you want them to or not.
Hi Sidi,
I know the placement of some steps as apps rather than as SSCUIs has been under discussion (pricing related configuration/setup in particular). I've reached out to try to get you some more information. Stay tuned.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
89 | |
8 | |
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.