on 09-15-2018 1:04 PM
Hi;
Just wondering if anyone knows if there is a pricing condition where we can specify prices based on the delivery organisation rather than service organisation. We have the use case where price are different depending on the cost center of the resource performing the work. For example we have project in sales organisation A that require several multiple Senior Consultants. Delivery Organisation B and C are supplying the resources. Apart from a different cost rates (which is easy), there is a different charge out rate depending on the Delivery Org.
This is the standard pricing model for this customer and it wouldn't be practical to define pricing individually for each resource.
Regards
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
This is possible with Set Material Prices app using combination: Material + Service Organisation. In this case, it is the service organisation of the consultant that you are stipulating in each of the condition records. So before selecting PSP0, you select service org A, and then when entering the service prices, you enter service orgs B and C prices.
There are two recent blogs I can point you to which are relevant to the pricing:
This one is really a guided example of charge-out combinations:
https://blogs.sap.com/2018/08/23/service-pricing-example-in-s4hana-cloud-professional-services/
The section around figure 9 is most related to your query.
And my colleague Tobias has another which goes deeper into the mechanics behind the possibilities:
https://blogs.sap.com/2018/08/28/activity-types-and-service-materials-for-project-services/
Section 3 is most related to your current query.
Please bear in mind that if you're setting this up, you should also review scope item 16T.
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.